Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Survivor - Merely a social game or a look at how sociology is all around us?

So, it took me awhile to think of something to write for this week's blog.  Quite frankly, there are so many things happening in the world today, that there is a lot to write on this week.  I decided to keep it light-hearted and write about one of my guilty pleasures - Survivor.  Yes, I do indulge in the reality show that has teams compete on a weekly basis on a deserted location, trying to survive with little food, shelter and are subjected to the hazards of mother nature. 
     What strikes me about this season of Survivor, and what has always drawn me to the show, is how it reflects the ways that human beings are also social beings.  So while each contestant tries to make it through 30 days in the wild individually, the objective of the game is to survive by relying on others until eventually you are selected by your peers as the ultimate survivor.  Contestants are voted off each weak until there is just one sole survivor.  The funny thing is that contestant are often voted off for violating the norms of the groups they belong to.  Remember from the reading that norms are simply rules and expectations a society deems fit.  While values are explain why the rules exist.  The same concepts ring true for Survivor.  Contestants are often voted off of Survivor for violating the rules or not knowing the rules, just like in society.  Sometimes contestants are eliminated for not fitting in or for being weird or bizarre.  Whatever the case may be, it often comes down to not meeting the expectations of the dominant group or culture.  You will typically hear the contestants say that Survivor is a social game.  This couldn't be more true.  While you have to depend on the typical attributes to win the various challenges each weeks such as strength, stamina, intelligence, and will power, you must also master the game by bargaining with others, cooperation, teamwork, and at times through straight up lying.  Contestants make alliances with one another and team up with people who will help them advance in the game.  Here's  a link to the latest episode:
                                                 http://www.cbs.com/shows/survivor/video/
     It's not terribly different from what we have to do in everyday life.  Oftentimes, we have to cooperate with people we don't like, follow rules, work together and sometimes be dishonest to meet our objectives. 
     There are a few things that stand out for me in this season's Survivor.  First, the contestants are separated into "tribes" by gender and with it comes all of the expectations and stereotypes of how men and women should behave.  And as if written on cue, the men start of the competition by relying on their brute strength and physical prowess to eliminate members from the women's team.  But what makes Survivor so intriguing this season is that while groups organize themselves in a similar fashion to the ways we organize ourselves in society (i.e. gender), there are also several sub-cultures that emerge among the groups.  For example, among the men, the alphas (extremely masculine, fit guys) form an alliance, leaving out the weaker men.  With the women, the younger women band together against the older women players.  This is reflective of what happens in society everyday, we form sub-cultures based on similar characteristics or attributes that standout from the dominant culture. 
     What is truly fascinating on the show however, is one of the characters from the men's team who is gay and makes no qualms about it.  When the show first starts he defiantly declares his affinity towards the women's team.  He openly goes back and forth between the teams and negotiates his position in the game by playing the men against the women.  He also convinces the women to give him an amulet that protects you from being eliminated in the games by telling the women that he is considered the weak link among the men.  However, this couldn't be further from the truth.  He uses his own attributes - intelligence, manipulation, is affinity towards the women, to advance in the game.  What results is that he emerges as one of the strongest contestants in the game and works with the weaker men to knock off some of the alpha men. 
   Survivor is entertainment and at times seems hokey and even fake.  But for me, it represents some of the biggest lessons about society.  Check out the show yourself or better yet, take a look at another television show and see what concepts you recognize from what we've learn so far this semester.  I think you'll see that sociology is all around us!

 

21 comments:

  1. While not a fan of reality shows in general, my mother's sister has been a huge fan of Survivor since the beginning. She always fills me in on the gory details of the lying, cheating and the rise and fall of various alliances between the contestants. It is indeed a microcosm of greater society. Another show that places a microscope over the social interaction of human beings is Big Brother (another of my Aunt's favorites). Contestants are sequestered in a house where they are subjected to various "challenges" to ultimately remain as the sole house member by the end of the show. They fight, they have sex and they band together into (often times) stereotypical groups to try and survive.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I feel that while reading this, you made certain points of the show that really stood out to me and how they are connected with our society now a days. And I feel that it is true, how even on t.v shows (reality shows in general)people divide themselves among groups where they feel comfortable and fit in. I personally like certain reality shows(mainly the ones on MTV)and occasionally watch them when I have time. This obviously happens with our society now as well, the strong with the strong, the weak with the weak, etc. The reason I liked this blog was because I feel it truly was connected with the story we just read ("Teenage Wasteland"). You mention how certain people on "Survivor" get voted out because they don't follow the "norms" and don't fit in, well I feel ultimately that is the reason the teenagers in "Teenage Wasteland" also committed suicide.

    ReplyDelete
  4. yes I agree special when you said the contestant divid themselves Into subgroups and culture.for example In high school some groups are form because of where somebody from,how they look and dress,how eduacated they are,strenght etc.The subculture?group keep building special for individuals who can't fit in.Also not following the rules and not having certain things(resources) can exclude Individuals from society.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I completly agree with the Professors point of view on how society divides itself into a subculture. Somtimes we dont feel powerful enough to fit into the dominant group, so we find people who have similar point of view as us and try to create a subgroup so we could feel part of a society. And sometimes to fit into the society we live in we have to act violent, lie, cheat, etc. because even if we dont really act this way, somtimes we have to go survive in the world that we live in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with her opinion. People will follow leader or get in to the group of people who deal with same point. Probably, if some who already got into the subculture begin to dislike it, they would follow another group or find other subculture. During this happening, we may fight or compete each other just like the survivor game show.

      Delete
  6. I've never been a fan of the show but i do find it interesting that even when there is already a division of gender, they create more division within that "tribe". Its kind of like an ongoing pattern, as long as some people think they have more power than the other, there will be some sort of division or sub-culture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that this is a great analysis using culture to evaluate this show. Before this using my sociological imagination i would of never thought of survivor in that way; I've always thought that it was just women being catty and men trying to prove their masculinity before i learned how to use my sociological imagination. I agree that people do for little groups that are called subcultures to feel safe like they belong ad that would be teir downfall putting all their trust into one group

      Delete
  7. I haven't watched the show Survivor but I heard it in my old place. I will take one part from professor that the society divides itself into subcultures. There have been many subcultures emerged but not all of them are powerful. It reminds me that few months ago there was "Occupying Wall Street" by a certain group of people and had grew up with more and more people. Although today that event is not going anymore, however, it demonstrates that certain group of people in the similar culture that had the same voice to cry out in public. This subculture is one of the dominant culture, freedom of speech.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Most TV shows are an imitation or representation of different aspects of society. I think this shows how interested in sociology we all are, whether we are aware of it or not.
    We watch shows because we are curious to see how various groups of society react to circumstances that we may encounter in our own lives, and how these reactions differ from group to group or between individuals. Sometimes the reason we watch shows is because we want to see how people somehow similar to us react in contexts that may seem absurd in which we don't imagine ourselves going through.

    ReplyDelete
  9. There's definitely a element of sub-culture occurring in the show because contestants form alliances to eliminate certain players. This often occurs in many reality shows and is common that certain people work together to have a advantage or cutting edge over someone else. I'm not a fan of the show, but I'd watch it occasionally just for a good laugh. I think most of these type of series are downplayed beforehand and I feel that its sketchy therefore I don't often like such shows.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The reality show Survivor does represent our society because of the diversity in groups and how the game works. In both our society and the game, the main reason for their fights is because of power. The dominant group is composed of those who have the characteristics and sources to win. Perhaps they determined how things should be done (in others words their rules) but also label everyone else which may influences on the other's decision most of the time. However, just like in our society not always the strongest one wins but the one how have a better strategy and a high level of persuasion.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I never thought to look at survivor in that such way. it's interesting to think about how human nature takes over when you're stuck on a island with strangers. In a way it's simple, we attract to people with similar features like ourselves, it's not so farfetched. If i were on an island with strangers I'm sure I'll do the same. I'm trying to think of a show that conveys this sort of idea...I'm into a lot of sic-fi shows so it's hard for me to make a connection. I watch smallville and I've noticed much of the villains on the show are the ones who are socially awkward. The better part of the show takes place in High School which as we know is a social jungle and only the strong survive. Of course the weaker in the food chain in high school are the nerds, artists (which are considered weird), even foreign students. The stronger being the cool kids, jocks, rebels, or the class clowns. In the show which chronicles Superman's life in his youth, Clark kent is a shy kid at first but then goes on to even become the quarterback of a football team. Most times these villains are the product of their environment. Some freak accident happens and instead of considering the power they have for good.. they lash out revenge on those who bullied them, called them names, or turn them down. The people around us create our identity. It's not exactly like survivor but it still represents how we act in certain situations especially our interactions with others which is most fragile in high school in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I can tell Sociology is really all around us, but, honestly, it is extremely difficult to connect the thoughts in regular life to academic theories. Anyway, I was fascinated by the correlation between sub-culture and dominant culture. I think that concept exist in any situation, in any relationship. Even that relationship exists between boy-girl relationships.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I am starting to notice that sociology is all around us and that you can easily get sucked into a group or alliance with out even noticing. Sub-cultures are all around us just like society.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I use to be a big fan of watchng the show Survior, but after I had just stopped being interested in watching it. Yes I agree when the professor states that subculture divides us. Even today with Faternites and Sororites today they are divided into groups faternites for guys and sororites for the girls. Each one of them are lead by a leader our society is, this just shows that sociolgy is surrounded by us. Even though television shows.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I also once was a fan of that show and then eventually stopped watching it and found a new favorite show. Learning about society and the norms and values makes you realize sociology is all around you more than you think. I thought that it was just in the world and how we perform, but didn't think it would be incorporated in television shows as well.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I am not really a fan of Reality shows except Fear Factor. I do have the 1st season of Pinoy Big Brother which is a lot like Survivor in that it is a group of people who are competing against each other to be the last one to stay in. There are those who group together and try to get the other groups out and then once the other group is out they will "attack" each other if you will and try to outsmart each other. I have watched a few parts of Survivor but am not into it.
    Life is full of subcultures, I believe start during high school. Before high school, one person might be friends with someone and then when they enter high school they are not friends. I don't understand why this is.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I honestly never watched the show but seems amazing how even reality shows relate to sociology but in the end is reality. TV is the main source of influence in today's society, children's are influence by the things they see on TV. I agree with the professor that society is all around us and that society divides itself into a subculture, and I also believe that people's lives are full of subculture through their entire lives.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I agree with you. People who work their way up the chain almost all have one thing in common and that is some sense of social skills. What I mean by this is that most of these people have the skills to make friends and contacts who can help build them a positive reputation and open doors that would usually be closed. Knowing the norms is also beneficial because then you know what not to do to draw negative attention to yourself, and with it the negative consequences that can hurt your prestige. The ones that know this and follow this are more likely to have success than those who do not know.

    ReplyDelete